News   Events   Featured


13.04.2017 Going once, going twice: how to become an auctioneer

13.04.2017 Must-See Art Guide: Dubai


Apr 5–Sep 4, 2017 Museo Reina Sofía , Pity and Terror: Picasso’s Path to Guernica, Madrid

Apr 6–Jul 23, 2017 Kulturforum, Alchemy. The Great Art, Berlin

Museo Reina Sofía, Franz Erhard Walther, Madrid

Apr 7–Aug 20, 2017 Cooper Hewitt, The Jazz Age, New York

Apr 9–Jul 9, 2017, Museum of Fine Arts, Matisse in the StudioMatisse in the Studio, Boston

MoMA, Past Skin, New York

Apr 15–Aug 13, 2017 MoMA, Making Space: Women Artists and Postwar... New York

Apr 24–Jul 30, 2017 The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Irving Penn: Centennial, New York

Apr 26–Aug 28, 2017 The National Gallery, Chris Ofili: Weaving Magic, London

Apr 30–Jun 8, 2017 The Cleveland Museum of Art, Brand-New & Terrific: Alex Katz in the 1950s, Cleveland

Apr 12 - 15, 2017 World Art Dubai 2017

Apr 19 - 23, 2017 Independent Brussels

Apr 21 - 23, 2017 Art Brussels 2017

Artexpo 2017

Apr 26 - 29, 2017 Art Cologne 2017



A Bar at the Folies-Bergère, 1882
Oil on canvas, 96 x 130 cm, Courtauld Institute Galleries, London

Édouard Manet (1832-1883)

Although they were prised by his colleagues, Manet’s paintings often met with disdain from the general public. His Luncheon on the Grass illustrates how he could transplant a traditional motif from the past into the present. The abandonment of perfect spatial illusion, exaggerated attention to detail, and narrative composition was sufficient to irritate the visual expectations of his contemporaries. Although usually capable of recognising mythological themes, they reacted to many manifestations of the obvious with uncertainty.
Unlike the Impressionist who revered him, he did not search for the incidental moment. His gaze is more matter-of-fact. It often appears as if his figures are pausing from their activities. The young woman behind the Bar at the Folies-Bergere is depicted in the midst of her turbulent workday, but she seems somehow withdrawn from her surroundings. To an extent, Manet achieves this effect with an evenly brightened palette but primarily through introducing an additional level to the composition. Behind the “real” bar maid, who is depicted frontally and in the middle of the composition, a Ruckenfigur version of this primary figure is visible in reflection (as are the bar and the entire scene of action). The woman’s reflection, which should not be visible from this angle, leads an intriguing life of its own; the reflection serves a customer’ the viewer, who actually stands before the “original”, taking the place of the reflected customer, is invisible to the bar maid. She is therefore not simply dreaming, she is metaphorically outside of herself.

Find more

Édouard Manet, Biography

Whistler by Duret, Théodore, 1917, London : G. Richards Ltd. ; Philadelphia : J. B. Lippincott Company

Masterpieces of Impressionism and Post-Impressionism: The Annenberg Collection by  Bailey, Colin B; Rishel, Joseph J, 1989, New York : Philadelphia Museum of Art in association with Harry N. Abrams

  Post-impressionist prints: Paris in the 1890’s by Ittmann, John W, 1998, Philadelphia, PA : Philadelphia Museum of Art   Pierre Auguste Renoir by Frost, Rosamund, 1944, New York : Pub. by the Hyperion Press : distributed by Duell, Sloan and Pearce